Pat McQuillan, Dan Gooris, Steve Drucker, Nick Schuster
Book Group: Activating the Unemployed
New Zealand
- Welfare-to-work program
- Subsidizing of job-related costs (child care)
- Time limit on benefits
- Must take any suitable job offers
- All of the these acts gave benefits
-
Old Age Pensions Act 1898
- Widows 1911
- Disabled miners
1915
- Blind 1924
- Unemployment Act 1930
- Social Security Act 1938
Norway
- Welfare is universal
- Benefits are generous
- Benefits and services provided by public agencies
- Publicly funded welfare depends heavily on high level of taxation and high
able-bodied employment
- Labour Market Training program
-
Wage compensation for employers
-
Competence, training for work and job creation for unemployed people
-
Mentor assisted practice place
- Social Securities Act 1991
-
Made people have to work to receive benefits
- Unemployment Benefits entitlement is
determined by taking earnings from year before unemployment and 62.4% of that is
compensated
- Can only receive benefits for 3 years at a time, 5.5 if lone parent and
studying
Sweden
- Welfare benefits for working population and those unable
to support themselves
- In first half of 1990s a number of cheap programs were instituted, these
programs upgraded labor
skill and increase competence building
- People 55 and older offered early retirement benefits
- Created new programs for young and unskilled
- To receive benefits have to participate in discussions with social welfare
offices and follow other rules
Switzerland
-Unemployment Insurance introduced1947
-Adopted 1951
-Federal Law on Compulsory Unemployment Insurance enacted 1982
-Unemployed people can get certain percent of salary for certain amount of days
-Temporary job programs
-Training programs
-Unemployed must take active measures to receive unemployment benefits
-Unemployed for more than 2 years can rely on social assistance programs
United Kingdom
-Welfare-to-work; 3 Main Goals
1.
Increase Job Opportunities
2.
Change characteristics and motivations of long term welfare recipients
3.
Reform structure of the tax and benefit system
-As of 1997 there were 42 different welfare to work schemes
-There was no national minimum wage in the country until 1999
- A working families tax credit system was implemented
- Families with at least one child and an adult working 16 or more hours per
week whose income fell below a certain level were entitled to certain benefits
- New Labor Program: welfare state
should help and encourage people of working age to work
Italy
- Unemployment rate in the country is one of the highest in
Europe
- Policies to help unemployment are outdated and ineffective
- Fighting unemployment is a top priority of the government
- Unemployment rate was 12% in 1995
- Youth unemployment is a big concern, people under 25 don’t work,
either because
there are no jobs or they do not want to
- Southern Italy is extremely poor; it is one of the poorest regions in all of
Europe
-
Socially Useful Jobs Program was implemented in 1981
Netherlands
-
Dutch policy used as guideline for many other countries
-
This approach is known as the “Polder” model
-
Ratio of benefit recipients to workers is one to one
-
Main points:
o
Long term wage restraint
o
Cuts in governmental expenditures, in exchange for employment
commitment from
employment organizations
-
Dutch welfare is developed separately without design of the
overall picture
-
Most of the unemployed Dutch are low-skilled and would be unable
to get a job
anywhere
-
Public assistance program hinges upon the global economy
-
Future problem will be to avoid a poverty trap will still offering
assistance
France
- Welfare to work
-
Social assistance based on philosophy and sociology, attaining
solidarity
-
Social protection funded by payroll contributions of social
security
-
Social security provides a quasi-universal coverage for recipient
-
75% of funding comes from payroll deductions
-
88% of social expenditures comes from social security
- use
public domain funded by the public to cover French citizens